Yes. Apparently that's a thing. Here's the announcement on Simon Terry's blog. Talk about timing for me to jump on the bandwagon as I enter week 3 of #WOL / #FridayUpdate.
This week started with me finalizing a blog post in which I ask: Are traditional workshops effective in changing participants’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors? It is an attempt to reflect a bit on the learning that took place a recent workshop. The more I attend “traditional” workshops, the more I wonder whether our seemingly natural propensity for holding face-to-face workshops is the best investment of time and money in terms of learning outcomes. I believe we aren’t measuring our “ROI” on this investment rigorously enough, so it is hard to answer this question. More in the blog.
My colleague Susan MacMillan yammered me earlier this week asking that I share more about my involvement in the first CGIAR Development Dialogue (CGDD). The CGDD will focus global attention on the vital role of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, landscapes and food systems in achieving sustainable development. The event will take place on 25 September 2014 in New York City at the Faculty House at Columbia University, alongside the UN General Assembly, the inaugural meeting of the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, and the UN Climate Summit. A by-invitation-only audience of circa 300 will attend. Thousands more will be included online through live webcasting and social media channels. I have been asked to co-lead one of the eight parallel sessions on "strategic and effective partnerships", working in collaboration with colleagues from Dryland Cereals, WLE, Humidtropics, L&F, RTB. The planning is still very fluid, and this week we received revised guidelines for the event. It now looks like the parallel sessions will be moderated debates (think Doha Debates) with four high-level speakers of which three should be from outside the CGIAR. Our team is planning to discuss and revise our proposal accordingly (luckily, we were already thinking about such a format). More on this in due course once we have the panelists lined up, key messages, etc.
Spent lots of time working on finalizing the terms of reference for the FEAST blended-learning work I mentioned last week. It culminated in a 23 page detailed proposal, that I hope we can get past all the required approvals in the coming week or so so the work can begin - we have an ambitious (self-imposed) deadline of mid September - which is quiet short considering all the deliverables:
The work complexity is compounded by the fact that in many/most of the placed we run FEAST, internet connectivity is unreliable. The dilemma we face is that most of the new / advanced tools all take it for granted that everyone is online and can access web-servers (where most of the tech is hosted) so if one needs (as we do) to have offline comparability, one starts a game of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole - so lots of reshaping of edges and cobbling together solutions. Will work out in the end - but it really is pushing the envelope in terms of trying to figure out how to deliver a 'best in class' experience without the normal enabling environment. I wish I had more instructional design colleagues actively engaged in similar work to bounce ideas on - but the consultant we've shortlisted is great - so hopefully we'll be a two-person community of practice until others join the party ;-)
Other bits of work included a discussion on restructuring the EXTRAPOLATE workshops, chairing the inaugural meeting of a taskforce to revise ILRI's Fellowship Guidelines, working on CapDev protocols for CRP L&F, Discussions with the IBLI team on possible marketing options for the next sales windoes andf finalizing the ToR for an IBLI Case study, meeting with ASARECA and exploration of some potrential joint activities, discussions on a Tools for Systems Analysis portal for existing tech tools (Cross-CRP, initially Humidtropics and Livestock and Fish), Touching base with a new ICARDA CapDev colleague who just joined our CGIAR CapDev CoP. Last but not least, I also had the rare pleasure of some face time with both our DDGs this week - a general catchup with Suzanne Bertrand and a more detailed initial briefing with Iain Wright - very important as about 80% of my work is currently embedded in his Directorate!
Hope you have a wonderful International #WOLweek !
(Photo credit: Simon Terry)
This week started with me finalizing a blog post in which I ask: Are traditional workshops effective in changing participants’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors? It is an attempt to reflect a bit on the learning that took place a recent workshop. The more I attend “traditional” workshops, the more I wonder whether our seemingly natural propensity for holding face-to-face workshops is the best investment of time and money in terms of learning outcomes. I believe we aren’t measuring our “ROI” on this investment rigorously enough, so it is hard to answer this question. More in the blog.
My colleague Susan MacMillan yammered me earlier this week asking that I share more about my involvement in the first CGIAR Development Dialogue (CGDD). The CGDD will focus global attention on the vital role of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, landscapes and food systems in achieving sustainable development. The event will take place on 25 September 2014 in New York City at the Faculty House at Columbia University, alongside the UN General Assembly, the inaugural meeting of the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, and the UN Climate Summit. A by-invitation-only audience of circa 300 will attend. Thousands more will be included online through live webcasting and social media channels. I have been asked to co-lead one of the eight parallel sessions on "strategic and effective partnerships", working in collaboration with colleagues from Dryland Cereals, WLE, Humidtropics, L&F, RTB. The planning is still very fluid, and this week we received revised guidelines for the event. It now looks like the parallel sessions will be moderated debates (think Doha Debates) with four high-level speakers of which three should be from outside the CGIAR. Our team is planning to discuss and revise our proposal accordingly (luckily, we were already thinking about such a format). More on this in due course once we have the panelists lined up, key messages, etc.
Spent lots of time working on finalizing the terms of reference for the FEAST blended-learning work I mentioned last week. It culminated in a 23 page detailed proposal, that I hope we can get past all the required approvals in the coming week or so so the work can begin - we have an ambitious (self-imposed) deadline of mid September - which is quiet short considering all the deliverables:
1.
Design
and develop both blended (instructor‐led + self‐guided) and entirely self‐ guided versions of a learning
course on the PRA methodology and FEAST tool, based on existing classroom materials, plus:
o
One module of original material on basic Excel skills
o A brief facilitator enablement (“train the trainer”) class to accompany the materials
o
Job aids and reference guides
for participants to use
in the field
2.
Produce all necessary video, audio,
printed materials and interactive eLearning for the course
3.
Set up, configure
and populate an LMS (learning management system) to deliver
the course content online, as well as track participant progress and run reports
4.
Development of metrics
to gauge the success
of the course and develop reports
in the LMS to help track key metrics
5.
Assure
that all eLearning
content complies
with the European Foundation for Quality in E‐Learning’s ECBCheck guidelines
6.
Create a brochure‐style website
and promotional video on the FEAST tool
7.
Document the process and help create an internal CGIAR presentation on the value of learning development and how it was applied to the FEAST program
The work complexity is compounded by the fact that in many/most of the placed we run FEAST, internet connectivity is unreliable. The dilemma we face is that most of the new / advanced tools all take it for granted that everyone is online and can access web-servers (where most of the tech is hosted) so if one needs (as we do) to have offline comparability, one starts a game of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole - so lots of reshaping of edges and cobbling together solutions. Will work out in the end - but it really is pushing the envelope in terms of trying to figure out how to deliver a 'best in class' experience without the normal enabling environment. I wish I had more instructional design colleagues actively engaged in similar work to bounce ideas on - but the consultant we've shortlisted is great - so hopefully we'll be a two-person community of practice until others join the party ;-)
Other bits of work included a discussion on restructuring the EXTRAPOLATE workshops, chairing the inaugural meeting of a taskforce to revise ILRI's Fellowship Guidelines, working on CapDev protocols for CRP L&F, Discussions with the IBLI team on possible marketing options for the next sales windoes andf finalizing the ToR for an IBLI Case study, meeting with ASARECA and exploration of some potrential joint activities, discussions on a Tools for Systems Analysis portal for existing tech tools (Cross-CRP, initially Humidtropics and Livestock and Fish), Touching base with a new ICARDA CapDev colleague who just joined our CGIAR CapDev CoP. Last but not least, I also had the rare pleasure of some face time with both our DDGs this week - a general catchup with Suzanne Bertrand and a more detailed initial briefing with Iain Wright - very important as about 80% of my work is currently embedded in his Directorate!
Hope you have a wonderful International #WOLweek !
